![]() ![]() This is exactly the type that were used up to 1999. I am in the RAF and been issued recently with a CWC G10 watch with a battery hatch and Tritum. Here's a thread on the watch on the WUS Pil-Mil Forum: JPI believe the 2004 hatchback is 50 meters water-resistant as well. could be nive to have in collection but only if CWC already on wrist. but propably snap back model will work better against water. ![]() Personally I prefer CWC G10 with the battery hatch type. To me (and propably some others also) it was new info that UK MOD has ordered CWC:s still 2004. Then you have very good change to do serching what common WIS can not. So you "are issued" mean you are in UK Army I believe. They could have given me a Pulsar!!! Perish the thought!!! ![]() Saying that we had W10 prefixes before so no suprise there. Lovely watch and keeps absolutely perfect time. It is the battery hatch type and all I can presume we must be short of the 2000 type with snap on back with the 6b prefix. Yes at the moment I have been issued with a CWC G10 with a W10 prefix and a year of issue 2004. I presume as years go on they seem to change it bit by bit. I think the jist of all we said there is no uniformity in the stampings/engraving on the backs of these watches. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |